Note: don’t for­get to check out the Bench­marks page to see the lat­est round up of binary and JSON serializers.

 

Since my last round of bench­marks on binary seri­al­iz­ers, there’s a new player in town – Mes­sage­Shark, which at the time of this writ­ing does not sup­port seri­al­iza­tion of fields, but offers com­pa­ra­ble speed and pay­load to protobuf-net.

Using the same test objects, here’s how Mes­sage­Shark com­pares to the other binary serializers:

Untitled_1

Untitled_2

Untitled

It’s early days for Mes­sage­Shark but the signs are good, com­pa­ra­ble seri­al­iza­tion speed with protobuf-net and a notice­ably faster dese­ri­al­iza­tion speed, def­i­nitely one to keep an eye out for!

Share

One Response to “Performance Test – Binary serializers Part III

  1. TJ says:

    Btw, I just recently checkin some changes to Mes­sage­Shark and I believe that could change the result of the seri­al­iza­tion. The change could yield a bet­ter result for Mes­sage­Shark in com­par­i­son to protobuf-net.

Leave a Reply