So that’s it for this year’s re:Invent. Werner delivered his usual insightful keynote and shared some key lessons in dealing with complexity and warning signs to look out for. As Werner said, the number of moving parts is not a good measure of complexity on its own. And that’s something so many people get wrong …
DynamoDB cuts on-demand price by 50% Announcement DynamoDB has reduced on-demand pricing by 50% and global tables by up to 67%. Amazing! Lambda SnapStart is now available for Python and .Net Announcement Previously, SnapStart was only available for Java. It makes sense to add support for .Net. But why Python and not Node.js? I guess …
Biggest pre:Invent 2024 serverless announcements Read More »
One of the most misunderstood aspects of Lambda is how throttling applies to async invocations. Or rather, how it doesn’t!
The TL;DR is that you will never experience throttling when you invoke a function asynchronously.
It also means that despite SNS and EventBridge having longer retry periods than Lambda’s internal queue, these have no practical impact in the case of Lambda throttling.
Read the full post to understand why.
One under-appreciated aspect of designing an Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) is how much information you should include in your events.
Do you send light events or rich events?
Or perhaps you would send both, but in different circumstances?
In this post, let’s talk about the pros & cons of each and how they fit into my mental model of DDD and EDA.
This article is about best practices for building event-driven architectures on AWS, with a focus on wrapping events in custom envelopes when using EventBridge.
While EventBridge provides metadata by default, a custom envelope allows for a standardized, consistent structure across all of your events, making it easier to manage and evolve the system over time.
By providing your own metadata, you can gain better interoperability between different services, end-to-end observability, idempotency control and versioning.
Gregor Hohpe said something that has me mulling over for some time now. Essentially, he asked, “Should we narrow the definition of serverless to mean just function-as-a-service (FaaS)?” “Serviceful” For context, I’m firmly in the “serverless means serviceful” camp: a) Serverless is a mindset: To leverage managed services to deal with undifferentiated heavy lifting so …
Should “serverless” just mean “function-as-a-service”? Read More »
Real-time applications have become increasingly popular, and most of us use one or more real-time chat applications, such as WhatsApp.
One of the key challenges with these applications is efficiently managing user connections. We might have a large number of connected users, but these connections are idle most of the time.
Unfortunately, many services that offer WebSockets support (such as API Gateway, AppSync and IoT Core) charge for connection time. It means we have to pay to keep users connected, even when they aren’t actively sending or receiving messages.
This can become very inefficient as our application scales. And that’s where Momento Topics come in!
Real-time notifications have become a big part of modern applications. They let us push updates to users instantly and are essential part of messaging apps, social media and online games.
It’s one of the most common use cases for WebSockets.
But building a WebSockets system that can scale to millions of concurrent users is no small task!
In this guide, we will see how Momento Topics abstract away the hard parts of WebSockets and makes it easy to add real-time features to your application with a few lines of code.
Many apps have leaderboards nowadays. From games to fitness apps that display step counts among friends. It’s a common way to gamify applications!
However, building a scalable leaderboard service can be challenging. A common approach is to model a leaderboard as a Redis sorted set, but that means managing infrastructure and paying for uptime for the Redis cluster.
Only if there’s a truly serverless caching solution that gives you pay-per-use pricing ;-)
In this post, we look at how you can implement fine-grained access control using Cognito access tokens and scopes. We will discuss the trade-offs of this approach and the cost implications of enabling Cognito’s Advanced Security Features (required for this approach to work).
Personally, I think this is too costly an approach and doesn’t offer enough upside in return.
Unless you’re using Advanced Security Features already, or your application has a high value per user (e.g. a B2B enterprise application), this approach may be difficult to justify in terms of return on investment.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.