I recently watched an excellent talk by Matt Lavin on optimization tips for Lambda and saw a slide on making DynamoDB use HTTP keep-alive. It reminded me of a conversation I had with Sebastian Cohnen, so I set out to test the effect this simple optimization has.
What is it all about?
As it turns out, Node.js’s default HTTP agent doesn’t use keep-alive and therefore every request would incur the cost of setting up a new TCP connection. This is clearly inefficient, as you need to perform a three-way handshake to establish a TCP connection. For operations that are short-lived (such as DynamoDB operations, which typically complete within a single digit ms) the latency overhead of establishing the TCP connection might be greater than the operation itself.
With the Node.js AWS SDK, you can override the HTTP agent to use for ALL clients with just a few lines of code. You can also override the settings for individual clients too.
To test the effect of enabling HTTP keep-alive, I setup a simple Lambda function behind API Gateway. Essentially this function puts an item into a DynamoDB Table, and that’s it.
For this experiment, I wanted to see how well the HTTP keep-alive fared across multiple invocations and how much of a difference do we see with this simple change.
Without HTTP keep-alive, the DynamoDB operation averaged around 33ms.
With HTTP keep-alive, that average drops to around 10ms.
As we suspected, the overhead (33ms-10ms = 23ms) was greater than the cost of the operation itself. The experiment shows that the connection is reused across multiple invocations just fine. With a very simple change, we were able to improve execution time by ~20ms, or to put it more impressively, reduce response time by 70%. That’s good return on investment in my book, but the difference is still not noticeable to the human eye.
But what if we scale this to 10 sequential DynamoDB operations in a single function?
With HTTP keep-alive, the function’s execution time averages around 60ms.
Without HTTP keep-alive, the average execution time rises to 180ms.
As I curl the endpoint, the difference of 120ms is definitely noticeable. This difference can start to impact user experience, and as Amazon found 10 years ago, adding 100ms of latency can reduce sales by as much as 1%.
I’m an AWS Serverless Hero and the author of Production-Ready Serverless. I have run production workload at scale in AWS for nearly 10 years and I have been an architect or principal engineer with a variety of industries ranging from banking, e-commerce, sports streaming to mobile gaming. I currently work as an independent consultant focused on AWS and serverless.
Come learn about operational BEST PRACTICES for AWS Lambda: CI/CD, testing & debugging functions locally, logging, monitoring, distributed tracing, canary deployments, config management, authentication & authorization, VPC, security, error handling, and more.
You can also get 40% off the face price with the code ytcui.
Here is a complete list of all my posts on serverless and AWS Lambda. In the meantime, here are a few of my most popular blog posts.
- Lambda optimization tip – enable HTTP keep-alive
- You are thinking about serverless costs all wrong
- Many faced threats to Serverless security
- We can do better than percentile latencies
- I’m afraid you’re thinking about AWS Lambda cold starts all wrong
- Yubl’s road to Serverless
- AWS Lambda – should you have few monolithic functions or many single-purposed functions?
- AWS Lambda – compare coldstart time with different languages, memory and code sizes
- Guys, we’re doing pagination wrong