I based my solution on Euclid’s formula for generating Pythagorean triples.
And given that max L is 1,500,000, the maximum value for m we need to consider is . Because and , we can deduce that ; and since we also have and therefore .
The above makes use of a recursive function to calculate the GCD (based on Euclidean Algorithm):
For efficiency, we’ll create a cache to store the number of ways L can be used to create integer sided right-angle triangle. As we iterate through the m and n pairs we generated above, we’ll take advantage of the fact that if then must also be true and increment multiples of L by one.
Finally, to work out the answer:
This solution runs for about 350ms on my machine.
The source code for this solution is here.
Enjoy what you’re reading? Subscribe to my newsletter and get more content on AWS and serverless technologies delivered straight to your inbox.
I’m an AWS Serverless Hero and the author of Production-Ready Serverless. I have run production workload at scale in AWS for nearly 10 years and I have been an architect or principal engineer with a variety of industries ranging from banking, e-commerce, sports streaming to mobile gaming. I currently work as an independent consultant focused on AWS and serverless.
In this course, we’ll cover everything you need to know to use AWS Step Functions service effectively. Including basic concepts, HTTP and event triggers, activities, design patterns and best practices.
Here is a complete list of all my posts on serverless and AWS Lambda. In the meantime, here are a few of my most popular blog posts.
- Lambda optimization tip – enable HTTP keep-alive
- You are thinking about serverless costs all wrong
- Many faced threats to Serverless security
- We can do better than percentile latencies
- I’m afraid you’re thinking about AWS Lambda cold starts all wrong
- Yubl’s road to Serverless
- AWS Lambda – should you have few monolithic functions or many single-purposed functions?
- AWS Lambda – compare coldstart time with different languages, memory and code sizes
- Guys, we’re doing pagination wrong