You may not realise that you can write AWS Lambda functions in a recursive manner to perform long-running tasks. Here’s two tips to help you do it right.
AWS Lambda limits the maximum execution time of a single invocation to 5 minutes. Whilst this limit might be raised in the future, it’s likely that you’ll still have to consider timeouts for any long-running tasks. For this reason, I personally think it’s a good thing that the current limit is too low for many long running tasks?—?it forces you to consider edge cases early and avoid the trap of thinking “it should be long enough to do X” without considering possible failure modes.
Instead, you should write Lambda functions that perform long-running tasks as recursive functions?—?eg. processing a large S3 file.
Here’s 2 tips to help you do it right.
When your function is invoked, the
context object allows you to find out how much time is left in the current invocation.
Suppose you have an expensive task that can be broken into small tasks that can be processed in batches. At the end of each batch, use
context.getRemainingTimeInMillis() to check if there’s still enough time to keep processing. Otherwise,
recurse and pass along the current position so the next invocation can continue from where it left off.
use local state for optimization
Whilst Lambda functions are ephemeral by design, containers are still reused for optimization which means you can still leverage in-memory states that are persisted through invocations.
You should use this opportunity to avoid loading the same data on each recursion?—?eg. you could be processing a large S3 file and it’s more efficient (and cheaper) to cache the content of the S3 file.
I notice that AWS has also updated their Lambda best practices page to advise you to take advantage of container reuse:
However, as Lambda can recycle the container between recursions, it’s possible for you to lose the cached state from one invocation to another. Therefore, you shouldn’t assume the cached state to always be available during a recursion, and always check if there’s cached state first.
Also, when dealing with S3 objects, you need to protect yourself against content changes?—?ie. S3 object is replaced, but container instance is still reused so the cache data is still available. When you call S3’s GetObject operation, you should set the optional
If-None-Match parameter with the
ETag of the cached data.
Here’s how you can apply this technique.
Have a look at this example Lambda function that recursively processes a S3 file, using the approach outlined in this post.
I’m an AWS Serverless Hero and the author of Production-Ready Serverless. I have run production workload at scale in AWS for nearly 10 years and I have been an architect or principal engineer with a variety of industries ranging from banking, e-commerce, sports streaming to mobile gaming. I currently work as an independent consultant focused on AWS and serverless.
Come learn about operational BEST PRACTICES for AWS Lambda: CI/CD, testing & debugging functions locally, logging, monitoring, distributed tracing, canary deployments, config management, authentication & authorization, VPC, security, error handling, and more.
Here is a complete list of all my posts on serverless and AWS Lambda. In the meantime, here are a few of my most popular blog posts.
- Lambda optimization tip – enable HTTP keep-alive
- You are thinking about serverless costs all wrong
- Many faced threats to Serverless security
- We can do better than percentile latencies
- I’m afraid you’re thinking about AWS Lambda cold starts all wrong
- Yubl’s road to Serverless
- AWS Lambda – should you have few monolithic functions or many single-purposed functions?
- AWS Lambda – compare coldstart time with different languages, memory and code sizes
- Guys, we’re doing pagination wrong