Yan Cui
I help clients go faster for less using serverless technologies.
This article is brought to you by
Don’t reinvent the patterns. Catalyst gives you consistent APIs for messaging, data, and workflow with key microservice patterns like circuit-breakers and retries for free.
Whilst working on a client project, I ran into an interesting problem with AppSync which I couldn’t find an answer after a lot of googling. I hope this article can save you the same pain should you run into the same problem.
The problem is that when you have a nullable nested field that you want to expand, you have to handle the null values in your VTL template and skip them. It was not obvious how to do this in a managed system like AppSync.
To give you a better idea of what I’m talking about, here is a drastically simplified version of the GraphQL schema.
type University { name: String! categories: [Category!] } type Category { name: String! sports: [CategorySport!] } type CategorySport { name: String! description: String coach: Coach # in the DynamoDB table, this is stored as a String } type Coach { id: ID! firstName: String! lastName: String! }
In the DynamoDB table, universities are stored in the University
table and users in the User
table. Categories and sports are modelled as properties of a university to minimize the no. of DynamoDB reads. And the CategorySport.coach
field is the profile ID for a user in the User
table.
To make it easier for the UI to consume the data, we expand the CategorySport.coach
field to be a fully fledged Coach
type.
So, I set up the resolver for this nested field and point it at the User
table. p.s. I’m using the Serverless framework with the excellent serverless-appsync-plugin to help me configure everything.
mappingTemplates: - type: CategorySport field: coach dataSource: userTable dataSources: - type: AMAZON_DYNAMODB name: userTable config: tableName: !Ref UserTable
And I configured the VTL templates for the request:
{ "version" : "2017-02-28", "operation" : "GetItem", "key": { "id": $util.dynamodb.toDynamoDBJson($context.source.coach) } }
and response:
$util.toJson($context.result)
And everything works great, except when CategorySport.coach
is null
.
What I needed, was a way to short-circuit the DynamoDB.GetItem
request when CategorySport.coach
is null
. After a lot of searching, my google fu yielded nothing and I turned to my good friend Heitor Lessa. He pointed me to this helpful post which mentioned #return
keyword that lets you short-circuit a resolver execution and return early.
With this, I was able to work around the problem by adding just 3 lines of code to my request template.
#if ($util.isNullOrEmpty($context.source.coach)) #return #end { "version" : "2017-02-28", "operation" : "GetItem", "key": { "id": $util.dynamodb.toDynamoDBJson($context.source.coach) } }
One thing to note is that you can’t have #return(null)
but #return
would null
as the result for the resolver, and skip the DynamoDB GetItem
operation and the response template altogether.
Whenever you’re ready, here are 3 ways I can help you:
- Production-Ready Serverless: Join 20+ AWS Heroes & Community Builders and 1000+ other students in levelling up your serverless game. This is your one-stop shop for quickly levelling up your serverless skills.
- I help clients launch product ideas, improve their development processes and upskill their teams. If you’d like to work together, then let’s get in touch.
- Join my community on Discord, ask questions, and join the discussion on all things AWS and Serverless.