Yan Cui

I help clients go faster for less using serverless technologies.

#### Problem

Find the greatest product of five consecutive digits in the 1000-digit number.

73167176531330624919225119674426574742355349194934

96983520312774506326239578318016984801869478851843

85861560789112949495459501737958331952853208805511

12540698747158523863050715693290963295227443043557

66896648950445244523161731856403098711121722383113

62229893423380308135336276614282806444486645238749

30358907296290491560440772390713810515859307960866

70172427121883998797908792274921901699720888093776

65727333001053367881220235421809751254540594752243

52584907711670556013604839586446706324415722155397

53697817977846174064955149290862569321978468622482

83972241375657056057490261407972968652414535100474

82166370484403199890008895243450658541227588666881

16427171479924442928230863465674813919123162824586

17866458359124566529476545682848912883142607690042

24219022671055626321111109370544217506941658960408

07198403850962455444362981230987879927244284909188

84580156166097919133875499200524063689912560717606

05886116467109405077541002256983155200055935729725

71636269561882670428252483600823257530420752963450

#### Solution

open System.IO let numbers = File.ReadAllLines(@"C:\TEMP\euler8.txt") |> Seq.concat |> Seq.map (fun c -> int32(c.ToString())) let CalcProduct numbers = numbers |> Seq.fold (fun acc n -> acc * n) 1 let maxProduct = numbers |> Seq.windowed(5) |> Seq.map (fun n -> CalcProduct n) |> Seq.max

To get the 1000 digits into the program, I copied and pasted the digits into a text file and saved it to *C:\TEMP\euler8.txt*.

Here you see an example of how you can use the File.ReadAllLines static method to read the contents of a text into a string array in F#. However, a string array doesn’t really help us here, so I used the Seq.concat function to merge them into a char array because mapping each char into the integer it represents.

Two things to note here:

1) why does *Seq.concat* return a char array as opposed to a string?

Because a string can be treated as a char[] in the same way that a *Dictionary<T, V>* can be treated as an *IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<T, V> >* and iterated as such when passed into a method which takes a *IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<T, V> >* as argument.

Looking at the signature of the *Seq.concat* function, it takes a *seq<‘T list>* (a sequence of lists of T, i.e. *IEnumerable<IEnumerable<T> >*) as argument and therefore the *string[]* is interpreted as *IEnumerable<IEnumerable<char> >* and concatenated into *IEnumerable<char>*.

The same is applied to all the List/Array/Seq functions when used on a string.

2) why is ToString() needed when casting a char to int32?

Because int32(char) will give you the unicode value of that char! For example,

int32('c') // this is legal and returns 99 int32("c") // this is illegal int32('1') // this returns 49 int32("1") // this returns 1

Moving on, the next line defines a helper function which takes a list of numbers and multiply them together, i.e [x; y; z] => x * y * z. I have done this with the Seq.fold function which applies a function to each element of the list whilst keeping an accumulator throughout, similar to the Enumerable.Aggregate method in Linq. In this particular case, the accumulator starts off at 1, and iteratively multiplied by the elements in the list:

let CalcProduct numbers = numbers |> Seq.fold (fun acc n -> acc * n) 1

It’s worth noting that this function will return 1 if used on an empty array which is not the correct behaviour, but for the purpose of solving the problem at hand it can be safely assumed that this will never happen.

Finally, in the last part of the solution, you will notice yet another new function Seq.windowed, which iterates through the elements in the list yielding a sliding windows of 5 elements:

numbers |> Seq.windowed(5);; val it : seq<int32 []> = seq [[|7; 3; 1; 6; 7|]; [|3; 1; 6; 7; 1|]; [|1; 6; 7; 1; 7|]; [|6; 7; 1; 7; 6|]; ...]

I then calculate the product for each of the 5 digit arrays and find the greatest product:

|> Seq.map (fun n -> CalcProduct n) |> Seq.max

**Whenever you’re ready, here are 4 ways I can help you:**

**Production-Ready Serverless**: Join 20+ AWS Heroes & Community Builders and 1000+ other students in levelling up your serverless game. This is your one-stop shop for**quickly levelling up your serverless skills**.- Do you want to know
**how to test serverless architectures**with a fast dev & test loop? Check out my latest course,**Testing Serverless Architectures**and learn the smart way to test serverless. - I help clients
**launch product ideas**,**improve their development processes**and**upskill their teams**. If you’d like to work together, then let’s**get in touch**. **Join my community on Discord**, ask questions, and join the discussion on all things AWS and Serverless.

Pingback: Project Euler — Problem 9 Solution | theburningmonk.com

Pingback: Project Euler — Problem 22 Solution | theburningmonk.com

Omusolution without high level functions:

open System.IO

let find5 list =

let rec loop list’ greatest =

match list’ with

|n1::n2::n3::n4::n5::tl -> loop (n2::n3::n4::n5::tl) (max greatest (n1*n2*n3*n4*n5))

|_ -> greatest

loop list 0

let numbers =

File.ReadAllLines(@”C:\euler\8.txt”)

|> Seq.concat

|> Seq.map (fun c -> int32(c.ToString()))

|> Seq.toList

let p8 = find5 numbers

Bryan SlatnerWhen I went to this problem it asks for the product of the

13adjacent digits with the largest product. My solution is nearly identical to yours (I used seq.reduce vs seq.fold), and presumably yields the same answer (9x9x8x7x9 = 40824)I change the argument to “windowed” to 13 and get

([|9; 7; 8; 1; 7; 9; 7; 7; 8; 4; 6; 1; 7|], 2091059712)

But Euler says this is not correct. Weird.

Yan CuiYour solution is probably correct, but with 13 digits it likely overflowed. Try using int64 instead, and a good practice when working on Project Euler problems is to “open Checked” so you don’t get surprised by silent overflows/underflows.

Bryan SlatnerAh, you’re right, of course. Total rookie mistake I should have thought of on my own.

Thanks!

Yan Cuino worries! I’ve been stung by overflows so many times in the past, coding challenges love to throw that in as a surprise ;-)